Thursday, April 11, 2013

WE MUST ACT NOW TO SAVE OUR MULTIPLICITY TO SAVE DEMOCRACY…





“So long as you do not achieve social liberty, whatever freedom is provided by the law is of no avail to you.” B.R.Ambedkar, these were the words of Dr Ambedkar as India adopted its Constitution. What would he have made of the state of India today?

India is hailed as the world’s largest and most vibrant democracy. The world is full of praise for the rule of law and democratic freedoms that are enjoyed only by India in its neighborhood. But I believe that democracy in our country is failing fast, as 65 years of democracy has failed to improve the lives of the masses in here. India has comprehensively under-achieved on all fronts; all that has changed is the skin-colour of the looters. Any criminal in the country can conduct in elections and the biggest part is that they win and become our MLAs, MPs and Ministers.

It was regrettable to see (on TV) the vandalism that occurred outside the district magistrate’s bungalow and circuit house in Berhampore a few week back, after the Minister of State for Railways, Adhir Ranjan Choudhury gave a call to gherao the official residence of the same. Mr.Chowdhary is a central minister and this sort of behavior is neither appreciable nor acceptable from someone who holds such a dignified position. The vandalism of a government vehicle and the breaking of flower pots and furniture by congress workers outside the district magistrate’s residence were not only undemocratic but also a penal offence! If a central minister like Choudhury is seen pretermit such behavior then offender and troublers in our society will fell inspired to coddle in anti social actions.

But this deplorable behavior doesn’t seem to be restricted to any particular party or a state this has been the phenomenon throughout the country across party line. Almost all state governments show less respect for the law and public view too often. Some chief ministers act decidedly against anyone who raises oppugn or satirize against no matter even if he is as harmless as a cartoonist or a poor cultivator.

And with so the Successive governments have let down its people, both at the Centre and in the states. Poverty, ill health, sanitation, lack of housing, schools, food, water and dignity remain the main reality for most Indians. The State has become autocratic and we all remember how two young girls were arrested for a Facebook remark, whereas most of the tyrannous ministers got away with the most inflammatory speeches with action to reaction theory’s leading to the deaths of thousands in successive riots and pogroms in Gujarat or highly derogatory remarks by a deputy Chief minister of Maharashtra equaling water with urine recently.

A cartoonist, a professor or a doctor who merely claim their rights of free speech find themselves in jail when ministers who are accused of looting thousands of crores from the people and the land find themselves with tickets for Subsequent elections. Some Industrialists who poison the land and our waters are given “Life Time Accomplishment Awards” by the some of the same rapscallions who cheat the people. The situation is such that we can lose all our earning not in gambling or at race course but in Hospitals, by paying for carrying on diverse tests whether essential or not for diagnosing an illness, and for the 5-star comfort they try to sell.

We are required to pay for the use of Road even after paying Road Tax, Duties and taxes on vehicles we possess and for the fuel we use for running the vehicle. Where we are heading? What is the definition of a country now - Is it the geographical area with boundaries or perhaps people controlling that area? Each geographical area is being divided now -districts in to 2 districts, States in to 2-3 states all in the name of peoples aspirations, good governance , small is beautiful and the gravity for their province rather the love for the nation and that is leading to dividing the country.
Undoubtly it takes time for a society to evolve, thousands of years of monarchy & then colonial rule, all have oppressed people to evolve as rational & loud citizens. I felt this heat personally after 26/11 where I think we saw first time such an impulsive reaction from laymen, after our independence movement. Similarly we witnessed people outrage over cases like Priyadarshini mattu, Jessica Lal, Nitish Katara, Ruchika and most recently the Delhi rape case I believe this to be growing awareness of common people towards domineering deeds; powerlessness of the Government's or others ! But then what’s the remedy to bring back things on track?

Here I completely agree with Press Council of India, Chairman, Justice Markanedya Katju who while addressing a symposium on "Reporting Terror: How Sensitive is the media?” organized by English daily 'The Hindu'. Said "Whenever a bomb blast occurs or such incident takes place, within an hour or so many TV channels start showing that an email or sms has come from the Indian Mujahideen, JeM or Harkatuljihad-e-Islam, or some Muslim name, claiming responsibility," Katju added."An email or sms could be sent by any mischievous person. But when your start screening this on TV and next day in print, the certain message you (read media) are sending is that all Muslims are terrorists and they having nothing to do except to throw bombs....You are demonizing the entire Muslim community and promoting communalism, “he added “Is this the responsible behavior of the media? I think it is totally irresponsible behavior which is promoting communalism in the country. This is very bad”. And any sane individual shall not disagree with Justice Katju that a speedy germination of an unbiased communication technology & media can help democracy to move towards maturity with a great pace.

But then whatever the conclusion be, If this is not wake up time then I am afraid there won’t be one and in time we shall loose the very meaning of brotherhood, communal harmony and above all our democracy….



http://muslimmirror.com/eng/we-must-act-now-to-save-our-multiplicity-to-save-democracy/


http://twocircles.net/2013apr09/act_now_save_our_multiplicity_save_democracy.html


http://epaper.kashmirmonitor.org/1142013/default.asp

Monday, February 25, 2013

TO AMERICA: CHANGE YOURSELF FIRST, BEFORE YOU TRY TO CHANGE THE WORLD...






To understand global terrorism and the current global obsession with terrorism, we have to go back to the history and study how the Americans have been playing a key role in helping terrorism flourish across the world. When during the Cold War Soviet Union attacked Afghanistan,the US - which had long been calling the shots from behind, came to the forefront, and launched a massive support and training campaign for the Afghan freedom fighters. Soon, the "mujahedeen" (holy warriors) were born and became well-known across the world.
We have not forgotten how the US encouraged the Mujahedeen in their fight against the Soviet forces. President Reagan on March 21, 1983 said: “To watch the courageous Afghan freedom fighters battle modern arsenals with simple hand-held weapons is an inspiration to those who love freedom.”

When the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan, a pro-Soviet party, took control of Afghanistan, Mujahedeen resistance spread. As Mujahedeen groups broke apart into different factions, the CIA tended to favour the most extreme among the Mujahedeen commanders. The US intelligence agency ensured that the most fanatical anti-Soviet groups were also the best trained and armed for the guerrilla warfare. It’s history now how the Mujahedeen were financed, armed and trained by the US during the administrations of Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Pakistan's secret service, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), was used as a liaison group by the US, in attempt to keep the American action as secret as possible.

Saddam Husain was the creation by the US. President Ronald Reagan initiated a strategic opening to Iraq, signing a National Security Decision Directive and selecting Donald Rumsfeld as his emissary to Hussein, whom he visited in December 1983 and March 1984. United States actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing U.S. military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to make sure that Iraq had the military weaponry required. In 1982, Iraq was removed from a list of State Sponsors of Terrorism to ease the transfer of dual-use technology to that country. But by then [in 1980] Saddam had already been made an honorary citizen of Detroit.

But By this time the world changed and the international financial institutions such as the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank through their Structural Adjustment Programs was able to do officially and openly what in previous decades had to be done through the CIA, the Marines, or hired armed force. The domination of American entrepreneurship and its industrialised allies had reached record levels without the unpleasantness of direct military intervention.

And Saddam’s Iraq, was the only Arab state to fundamentally resist such trends, the only Arab nation to combine a sizable educated population, large oil resources, and adequate water supplies, thereby making it possible for Baghdad to maintain a truly autonomous foreign and domestic strategy. Even twelve years of cruel sanctions could not depose the government or make the establishment more willing to collaborate with Washington’s tactical and financially viable agenda. As a result, the United States felt obliged to revert to cruder forms of intrusion in Iraq.
Osama bin Laden- who was once a prominent Mujahedeen leader in Afghanistan, too benefited a lot from the hospitality extended by the Americans in the beginning of his guerrilla life.

In fact in Obama, people of all faith saw not just the historic election of a Black man in America, but the hope, the possibility, that he would be different from his presidential predecessors. We all believed, as Nelson Mandela had done in post-apartheid South Africa, Obama would use diplomacy instead of bombs, to bring peace. But he has used violence and has ended up creating much bigger chaos. The popular perception today is that even he is arrogant- very much like his predecessors and his country is a self-appointed global police, even if it is sometimes under the cover of NATO or this or that coalition.

If we just examine the Egyptian revolt as it snowballed from the beginning , it becomes clear why people feel the way they do. US government financed Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak for three long decades, turned heads on his abuses of power and the people, then initially announced US help for him until it became clear that the Egyptians weren’t having it. In other words, America just cannot continue to claim they believe in democracy in America, while simultaneously condoning and aiding the opposite in other countries.

I believe it is for that reason Mr. Obama was given, extremely prematurely, a Nobel Peace Prize just a mere 9 months into his presidency. The feeling, perhaps very naively, was that he would transform America, and the world. But he disappointed us all.

In spite of Bin Laden’s murder, violence, war, and terrorism are not over, not by a long stretch. None of that will end until the US help make those things end. Their current mindset and foreign policy approach will only lead to more death of young soldiers from the US and other countries, more attacks on Americans at home and abroad. And the entire world, including us, will be perpetually distrustful, forever looking over our shoulders and living a life in fear, that fear framed by metal detectors, security cameras, and sharp glances at people who appear to be different in anyway.

Americans thinks that other nations, or terrorists, or this or that enemy, are simply picking on them because of their “freedoms.” But There are enough articles, blogs, books, and documentary films out there, if one actually cares to research American history and American foreign policy, to let one know they’ve been, on numerous occasions, as violent toward others as others have been toward them.

America should know that it can never change the world, until it changes its own way...



http://muslimmirror.com/view-points/2677-to-america-change-yourself-first-before-you-try-to-change-the-world


Monday, February 18, 2013

PROSECUTION FRAMES INNOCENT MUSLIMS, COURTS ACQUIT THEM…




THE high-profile case of the Indian Parliament Attack saw its apparent end with the execution of Afzal Guru in Delhi’s high security Tihar jail last fortnight. Hanging of Guru did not matter much to the Muslims who are often branded anti-national and gibbeted everyday despite being staunchly patriotic as others. Muslims in India have faced gross discrimination and have remained neglected for years now. No political party has ever tried to sincerely pay heed to the grievances of this largest minority community. Only during the pre-election period some leaders pretend that they care for the Muslims. Even a section of the media uses hollow rhetoric and jingoism targeting the Muslims on different issues, and they wrongly believe that they are performing a patriotic duty.

It is important to recall and realize that not even once ordinary Muslim citizens of India have supported terrorists or have been found to be involved in such nefarious activities. In the past one or two decades intelligence agencies enthusiastically arrested few thousands of Muslim youths accusing them in scores of terrorist attacks. Some were branded as masterminds of the attacks by the agencies and in several media trials they were routinely found guilty of the attacks. Thousands of Muslims remain confined and detained all over the country on fictitious terrorism charges, concocted by the (communally-biased)prosecution.

But thankfully the judiciary- that has remained unbiased considerably, apart from acquitting nearly all innocent Muslim youths, scolded police and other investigating agencies for framing the innocent Muslims. Legal experts surveying the terrorism cases involving Muslim youths say that the rate of acquittal of the Muslim youths in the past has been as high as 99%- clearly highlighting the bias Muslim youths face in prosecution. For Muslims life has been like that since long, irrespective of which party rules the country.

It is crucial to understand the approach of television news anchors who have effectively managed to drive personal viewpoint into news, and rubbish all rational voices that seek answers to complex cases including terrorist attacks. News channels are supposed to report the news, not give their editorial comments and restrict contrary voices from giving their views. Journalists must understand they are not elected by citizens or shareholders, but are accountable to the people whose trust in the accuracy and integrity that enables their work unfortunately much of this has now been squandered and history shall stand to mock them if they don’t make their style more ethical quickly to put things right.

Prosecution often brand the accused Muslim youths as “dreaded terrorists” and routinely pile cooked-up evidences against them. When these cases are heard in courts of law, the prosecution fails to prove the allegations they leveled against these innocent Muslim youths. However, after suffering confinement and disgrace for as long as 20 years, the best years of the life of the arrested youths get exhausted. Their friends and relatives shun them and their families suffer terrible devastation and trauma. And, the innocent youths, after coming out of jail face a bleak future.

Sadly the penetration of communal elements into police and intelligence agencies is responsible for all the excruciation faced by the innocent Muslim youths in terror-related cases. It indeed brings shame to the law enforcement structure of the country. As falsely the Muslim youths are framed in the cases, the real culprits of most terror activities wander freely. There is also a tendency among the investigative agencies to choose and fix some suitable ‘scapegoats’ and declare a case solved- to cover up someone else’s crime directly or indirectly and to willfully target Muslim youth in the cases. Such wrongful arrests have the potential to alienate Muslim youths in the society.

It is imperative to know Indian Muslims are as patriotic as any other stakeholder to this country and rarely will you find a Muslim being convicted in any terrorist or anti national activity by the court and that’s proof enough for the said disputation. Therefore it is earnestly anticipated from the people sitting at helm in corridors of power, civil society and media barons to take a realistic and positive approach towards this alienation of Muslims in Indian society as weak minority shall make a weaker nation.

A small list of cases in which Muslims had been framed by the prosecution, but judiciary acquitted them:

In Hyderabad the 7th Metropolitan Sessions Judge Radha Krishna threw out the casehttp://twocircles.net/2008dec31/21_hyderabadi_muslim_youths_acquitted_terror_charges.html and acquitted all the accused. He said that the prosecution had failed to bring any evidence to prove the charges against them.

1.Md.Abdul Sattar (In Cherlapally Jail) Arrested on 15/06/2007

2.Md.Abdul Kareem Qadri @ Karem (In Cherlapally Jail) Arrested on 15/06/2007

3.Masood Ahamed (In Cherlapally Jail) Arrested on 4/09/2007

4.Arshad Khan @ Fayaz Khan Arrested on 4/09/2007

5.Md.Naseeruddin @Fayaz Khan Arrested on 4/09/2007

6.Md.Abdul Raheem @ Raheem Arrested on 4/09/2007

7.Syed Abdul Qader @Imran Arrested on 4/09/2007

8.Shaik Mohammed Faredd @ Ali Pasha Arrested on 4/09/2007

9.Gulam Aslam Siddiqui Arrested on 4/09/2007

10.Syed Abdul Sami (Absconding)

11.Md.Abdul Kareem@ Anwar Arested on 8/9/2007

12.Syed Zulfiqar Ahamed@ Ifteqar (Absconding)

13.Md.Abdul Wajeed. Arrested on 8/9/2007

14.Abdul Wase Arrested on 8/9/2007

15.Mohd Abdul Majid B/O SHAHED BILAL Arrested on 27/9/2007

16.Mohd Rayees Uddin Arrested on 6/9/2007

17.Md.Mustafa Ali Arrested on 6/9/2007

18.Ibrahim Ali Junaid Arrested on 8/9/2007

19.Mohtashim Billa S/O MOULANA ABDUL ALEEM ISLAHI Arrested on 6/3/2008

20.Gulam Hasan Siddique (Absconding)

21.Md.Shakeel .Arrested on 27/9/2007



In Ahmadabad On Jun 11, 2009 , (http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-06 11/ahmedabad/28193522_1_acquits-jihadi-charge-sheet) the Additional Sessions Judge IB Waghela acquitted Kari Mufidul Islam Shaikh along with city-based youths Ilyas Memon and Siraj Ansari some three years after the city crime branch had booked them for “sheltering jehadi terrorists and conspiring to avenge 2002 riots”. The judge held that there was no evidence against them to establish their involvement in terrorist activities.

Finally compensation for 70 Muslims youth ( http://nvonews.com/2011/12/13/muslim-youth-get-acquitted-in-terrorism-charges-get-compensation) who were arrested in connection with Mecca Masjid Blast and later released by court as there were no evidence against them. Perhaps this will be the first instance in India when a Government will give compensation to falsely arrested people for terrorism.

Police must ensure that no innocent person has the feeling of sufferance only because “my name is Khan, but I am not a terrorist,” a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad said (http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/dont-give-terror-tag-to-innocent-minority-people-supreme-court/article3939481.ece). It ordered the acquittal of 11 persons, arrested under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and other laws, and convicted for allegedly planning to create communal violence during the Jagannath Puri Yatra in Ahmadabad in 1994.



In a separate case a principal district judge GN Patel acquitted Firoz alias Abdullah Ghaswala fromMumbai, Mohammed Ali alias Ubaidullah Chhipa, Vakil Ahmed Saiyed and Umar Farooq Shaikh from Ahmedabad, Anisul alias Mursalim alias Sujoy alias Ashiq Bari and his brother Muhibul alias Mushtaqim Bari from Bangladesh(http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-07-29/ahmedabad/28276396_1_hawala-racket-trial-courts-gujarat-ats) All the six were booked by ATS, then headed by DG Vanzara (who was suspended and is now in jail), in May 2006 for conspiracy, waging war against nation and possession of explosive substance. They were accused of going to Pakistan to receive training from Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Azam Chima. Upon returning from the neighbouring country, they were planning to blow up Kandla pipeline, Somnath temple and Sabarmati overbridge besides the offices of RSS, VHP and Bajrang Dal, the prosecution alleged.

And 14 Muslim youths were arrested following the serial bomb blasts in Jaipur on 13th May2008.(http://twocircles.net/2011dec25/youths_acquitted_jaipur_blast_charge_narrate_jail_horror.html), All 14 were acquitted by the Rajasthan High Court on 9th December, 2011 .


http://www.muslimmirror.com/view-points/2409-prosecution-frames-innocent-muslims-courts-acquit-them#disqus_thread


http://twocircles.net/2013feb17/framing_innocent_muslims_who_responsible.html

http://www.theeasternpost.org/archive_more_cover.php?id=164&dt=2013-03-13

Sunday, February 3, 2013

The Controversy surrounding Kamal Hassan’s “Vishwaroopam”….





Kamal Hassan’s recently-released Vishwaroopam has landed in a big controversy in Tamil Nadu and the film has been slapped a two-week ban in his home state Tamil Nadu few days ago. It is alleged that as the subject of the film deals with the world favorite topic these days i.e., “Islamic Terrorism” and that the main villain in the movie is named Omar (many refers it to Taliban’s Mullah Omar), the Muslims have protested against the release of the film in the state. And now, there is a rumour that even Uttar Pradesh is set to ban the movie soon because, the authorities there think that it had the potential to hurt Muslim emotion there.

A handful of men who are driven by their own political interest are appearing before the media apparently as the representatives of the community. What these men are saying about the film before the media are not always enough what Muslim masses think about it. It is of utmost importance that we offer the Muslim viewpoint on the entire subject. Most of the people protesting against the film have not seen the film as it is not released there as yet. But on the basis of whatever little we have read about the film, we are sure that the movie is based on terrorism, and “Al Qaida” does form an integral part of the storyline with ‘Omar” as one of the evil protagonists. Now the issue is: is the name of Omar or the interwoven reference to Al Qaida or the terrorist shown offering namaaz or reading the Quran objectionable? No absolutely not. It is no secret that Al Qaida is an Islam-based organization which has indulged in evil activities, and in that case it should not be bothersome to us at all.

Just like all members of the groups that killed Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi happened to be Hindus and Sikhs. But we can never say that all Hindus or Sikhs are terrorists. There are noble and evil people existing in all communities. However, in recent times Islamic Terrorism has become the favorite topic with the film-makers globally.

But then there are other angles to the controversy as well which are equally important to be mentioned here. As some say the trouble started brewing earlier when Kamal Hassan’s big gamble to screen the film simultaneously on (Direct to Home) DTH services came to the limelight. Apparently, he struck a deal with several DTH operators which would have made it possible to screen Vishwaroopam on DTH on the same day as its theatrical release. As soon as one leading distributor came to know about Kamal Hassan’s new distribution model, he alerted other theatre owners across Tamil Nadu. Others put in that Kamal Hassan declined the copyrights offer from a famous south Indian satellite channel, thus antagonizing some powerful people in Tamil Nadu. There is a third version too that goes like on December 30 at a function down south Kamal Hassan admired Mr.P.Chidambaram’s efficiency as a politician and said that he was fit to become the prime minister of the country. Although how efficient Mr Chidambaram would be as the PM is a subject for a bigger debate, the fact is the comment by Mr Hassan has certainly not gone down well with some powerful politicians on the other side.



But whatever the reasons be, the community feels in the absence of proper leadership amongst the Muslims, they are made scapegoats in all cases and have turned as the favorite punching bag for the pseudo-nationalists who tend to undermine the glaring fact that no religious community is synonymous with terrorism and so the Muslims must not be seen through the prejudiced spectrum as some filmmakers and others are doing.

There have been incidents where a colonel-ranking Hindu officer was found ganging up with some Hindu religious people in terrorist attacks against Muslim targets by India’s National Investigation Agency. In many attacks those terrorists, who included even one Hindu nun, interestingly posed as Muslims, I wonder, why no filmmaker has shown interest in this subject of Hindu terrorism as yet. Frankly speaking many films have been made on Islamic terrorism and the theme has become hackneyed. On the other hand, Hindu terrorism (http://www.indianexpress.com/news/joining-the-dots/1068448/) is rather new and films based on this theme could be very interesting, I think....

http://www.kashmirmonitor.org/kashmonitor/02062013-ND-controversy-surrounding-%E2%80%9Cvishwaroopam%E2%80%9D%E2%80%A6-41589.aspx

http://www.milligazette.com/news/6300-kamal-hassans-vishwaroopam


Please follow the link to talk show (I attended) on NDTV INDIA's Prime Time of 31/01/2013 on the same issue....

http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/prime-time/video-story/263638?fb_action_ids=553375484682244&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_source=timeline_og&action_object_map=%7B%22553375484682244%22%3A345766705537210%7D&action_type_map=%7B%22553375484682244%22%3A%22og.recommends%22%7D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D&code=AQDxUwEAFQMDV2k7rhPw_3gi8L2lsOx1o0kLPXavlwM7tTMML-YPL8u0tPCs0dwegx-B8LIadcVgTFfxEJcTUS3lnKyW4OOazd7U3tIgcG34pAu_-bwQQim3gQ9oASY1D4_GgSxpbMiPrkwDj1w2gtzq7SUEvJGkaS01iLV-ct7ygnQI5e7nMVNNPtknuwSd7uxBzRYPuiqIFtDr55bvcdU8#_=_


Sunday, January 13, 2013

Muslim legislator comes under fire for "hate speech"


Aziz Mubaraki, a spokesman of the Tipu Sultan mosque in Kolkata, told Khabar, "Muslim society does not need political leaders like Owaisi. We need leaders who will take the community forward by building good relations with Hindus, Christians and others.

"This man thrives in keeping Muslims backward and in a state of conflict."

http://khabarsouthasia.com/en_GB/articles/apwi/articles/features/2013/01/12/feature-01

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

FDI in Retail is a much desired decision ....





The headlines these days are filled with the stories of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Retail sector which has become the point of disagreement, and seems to have split the country into two camps. One group is supporting it and the other is opposing and denouncing it. But interestingly, both are offering examples from economic sectors to prove their points in the contention. As everyone else has sided with one group or the other, I too have taken a stand on the issue and have decided to go in its favour.

In India there are two types of protests. One is genuine and inevitable, like the protest against the indifference by the successive federal and state governments in dealing with the Bhopal Gas victims or the kins of victims of Uphaar cinema etc, which by any means are an absolute necessity, as it is a move to awaken the otherwise lethargic administration. The other kind of protests is born out of political interests, mostly to earn brownies against the political opponents. They are not only wrong, but are misleading too.

Until the liberalisation of 1991, India had been largely and intentionally isolated from the world markets, to protect its economy and to achieve self reliance. Foreign trade was subject to import tariffs, export taxes and quantitative restrictions, while foreign direct investments (FDI) were restricted by upper–limit equity participations, restrictions on technological move. But in a historic decision on 14 September 2012, Government of India allowed FDI in the country. In aviation up to 49%, in broadcast sector up to 74%, in multi-brand retail up to 51% and in single-brand retail it allowed an FDI up to 100%.

FDI is nothing new to the world nor to India as we had make some major changes in 1991 which has helped our economy grow at steady pace even after the downslide trend on world’s business index. And starting from a reserves of less than $1 billion in 1990, a recent UNCTAD survey projected India as the second most important FDI destination (only next to China) for international corporations during 2010–2012. As per the statistics, the sectors which fascinated higher inflows were services, telecommunication, construction activities and computer software and hardware. Mauritius, Singapore, USA and UK were among the foremost sources of FDI. According to Ernst and Young, foreign direct investment in India in 2010 was $44.8 billion, and in 2011 experienced an increase of 13% to $50.8 billion, and so India has seen an eightfold enhancement in its FDI in March 2012.

FDI threats and real scenario:

The major justification offered by opposing detractors are that the FDI in retail sector shall harmfully impact the small retailers, farmers and consumers, and will give rise to domination by large trans-national retailers, which may negatively affect the pricing and supply of the goods. They also claim that the unorganized retail sector in India is one of the major employment generators, and granting permission to FDI in this sector could mean loss of livelihood for the small traders. The dispute that the introduction of FDI and supermarkets will relocate a large number of small traders is similar to the argument used during the era of industrial licensing, which was meant to protect small-scale industries. But eventually the inefficiencies and quality standards of the protected small-scale companies become evident even to the communist politicians consequently the said licensing was abolished. But then too small-scale industries have not died. As an alternative, they have learnt to co-exist as suppliers to large-scale industries. Apart from it, the small traders in large parts of the country will enjoy built-in safeguard from superstores because the latter can only exist in large cities. On the other hand, the ability of supermarkets to demand pricing and quality standards from manufacturers will benefit even small shops, who can even buy the same quality product from the same manufacturers to sell the same in smaller towns and villages.

It surely can be disputed, that since the reward cited above are due to the scale of operations rather than the input of foreign capital, why should we allow FDI in retail trade then? The case for FDI has more to do with the assurance and eagerness to invest hefty amounts in a short period as well as the proficiency based on knowledge. Even to set up a modest chain of 200 supermarkets in selected towns and cities acrossw India in the next three years, will require an investment of about Rs 2,000 crore (Rs 20 billion), at the rate of Rs 10 crore (Rs 100 million) per supermarket to cover the infrastructure and working resources. Each supermarket may take 2 or 3 years before it becomes fully operational and gainful. There is also a risk that a few of them may even fail. And in that scenario how many local Indian entrepreneurs will be enthusiastic and able to entrust this level of investment and agree to the risks involved therein? That is where the intercontinental know-how and skills that may come with FDI would provide the assurance and capital. Apart from this, by allowing FDI in retail trade, India will become more incorporated with provincial and an international economy in terms of quality standards and consumer prospects. These Supermarkets could supply several consumer goods from India for wider international markets. India undoubtedly has a benefit of being able to produce several categories of consumer goods, viz. fruits and vegetables, beverages, textiles and garments, gems, jewellerys, and leather goods. The advent of FDI in retail sector is bound to pull up the quality standards and cost-competitiveness of Indian producers in all these segments. That will benefit not only the Indian consumers but also open the door for Indian products to enter the wider global market. It is therefore obvious that we should not only permit but support FDI in retail trade.

Job opportunities:

Apart from it the development of organized retail has the probable of generating employment for both the skilled and unskilled people. Furthermore, the government of India can protect the interest of small retailers by restricting FDI to be permitted only for stores having floor size greater than say 2,000 square feet. Moreover, monopolies of large MNC retailers can also be checked by the government by enforcing strict regulations and, whoever needed, through the Competition Commission of India. Like in China, even after many years of emergence of multi-brand retailing and supermarkets, 90% of fresh food and 70% of all food is still controlled by traditional retailers. An impressive growth has been noticed in the retail and wholesale trade there after Chinese government approved 100% FDI in retail sector.

Beneficial to farmers as well:

It can be understood that, with the establishment of multi-brand retail, the essential goods industry like food and packaging industry will also get benefits and improve too. As we are aware India is one of the largest producers of fruits and vegetables; but it has limited integrated cold-chain infrastructure. Non-availability of ample storage facilities is a cause for heavy losses to the farmers, as well in terms of wastage in quality and quantity of fruits and vegetables in particular. With adoption of liberal, there could be a complete revamp of the currently uneven supply chain infrastructure. Extensive backward integration by MNC retailers, coupled with their technical and equipped proficiency, can optimistically remedy such structural drawback. Also, farmers can get benefit with the “farm-to-fork” the chain of food supply, from the farm where it is produced to the consumer ventures with retailers which helps (i) to reduce number of mediators ; (ii) give fair prices to farmers, and (iii) provide steadiness and economies of scale which will benefit, in the ultimate analysis, both the farmers and consumers.

Even the Journal of International Economics, supports the idea of FDI with an analyzed example that about 69 developing countries which welcomed FDI ultimately grew into stronger economies in the past two decades. Their results suggest that FDI is in fact an important vehicle for the transfer of technology, contributing to growth in larger measure than domestic investment. Moreover there is a strong complementary effect between FDI and human capital, that is, the contribution of FDI to economic growth is enhanced by its interaction with the level of human capital in the host country.

Major flaw in the policy who oppose FDI in retain.

We know that India's economy was largely reliant on its large domestic market with external trade accounting for just 20% of the country's GDP. But during the past 15 years, the importance of FDI in the world economy has increased rapidly. The total stock of FDI increased from 8% of world GDP in 1990 to 26% in 2006. Although the bulk of FDI continues to take place between OECD countries, the increase in FDI has been particularly pronounced in developing countries, largely reflecting the integration of large emerging economies, like the Brazil, Russia, and China. Even The share of non-OECD countries in the global stock of inward FDI has risen from 22% in 1990 to 32% in 2005. China by far has remained the most important non-OECD country as a recipient of FDI, accounting for about one-third of FDI in non-OECD countries in 2005.Frankly speaking, since the mid-1990s inward FDI has become the main source of external finance for developing countries and is more than twice as large as official development aid.

Therefore it is advisable to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of the planned policy of allowing FDI in retail trade. One key point is that we must differentiate between the benefit of consumers, who comprise India’s population of nearly 120 crores, from the interests of small traders or retailers, who may number over one million. It is obvious that the welfare of the consumers should be on priority over those of the retailers. FDI in retail and the development of larger stores and supermarkets have many advantages from the point of view of the consumers. FDI will provide right of entry to larger financial resources for investment in the retail sector and that can lead to several of the other advantages that follow; The larger supermarkets, which tend to become regional and national chains, can bargain prices more insistently with manufacturers of consumer goods and is expected to pass on the advantage to customers; They can lay down better quality standards and guarantee that manufacturers adhere to them. Many consumer goods manufacturers will find that supermarkets account for a growing share of their sales and will be afraid of losing this important and reliable customer to competition. The fact that a well-known chain of supermarkets sources from a manufacturer becomes a stamp of quality. With the availability of finance, the supermarkets can invest in much better infrastructure facilities like parking lots, coffee shops, ATM machines, etc. All this will make shopping a pleasant experience. The supermarkets offer a wide range of products and services, so the consumer can enjoy single-point shopping. And optimistically speaking with this kind of liberalization in retail, who knows some day an Indian group with strong local brand quality and international network like the Reliance or Tata can collaborate with international supermarket chains and may set up supermarket chains all across the globe!


When Rajiv Gandhi introduced computers in India and Atal Bihari Vajpayee planned the golden quadruple highways in the country, the Communists and also some other groups resisted the projects. Even when Indira Gandhi announced the plan to set up underground railway service in Kolkata, the communists went berserk. But now we all know how all these projects benefited us. Now the communists, BJP and many others are resisting the FDI in retail in India. Let the government ignore the protests and push ahead with the plan on the FDI. I am sure after sometime most in India will say that FDI in retail has benefited the country, and those who are resisting the foreign investment today will fall on line soon.

Sunday, August 12, 2012

ETHNIC CLEANSING OF ROHINGYAS IS GOING ON IN MYANMAR...







The world remains silent!
Sectarian violence is nothing new in Rakhine, the northern province of Burma (Myanmar) where minority Muslim Rohingyas have been attacked by Buddhists for quite some time. It is alleged that this time it all started after some Muslim miscreants robbed, raped and murdered an ethnic Rakhine Buddhist woman on 28th May this year. And honestly speaking, the verification of the incident- whether the Buddhist woman had been attacked by Muslims was not required at all because the persecution of the stateless Rohingyas had started long before this May incident. The Muslims make up nearly five percent of Myanmar's more than 53 million populations. And the largest group of Myanmar’s Muslims is the ethnic-Bengali minority, generally known as the Rohingyas, who mainly live in the western state of Arakan or Rakhine.

Elsewhere rape or murder is an ordinary crime. There are laws to deal with a rapist or murderer. I am sure in Myanmar there must be instances of a Buddhist committing such crime against a Buddhist. Usually none bothers to find out what religion the rapist belongs to. It’s illogical that you will target the entire Muslim community just because the rapist was Muslim. It’s clear that they used the rape as an excuse to step up the attack on the Muslim Rohingyas who have been attacked for some years.

When Arab traders reached the region in the 8th century, ancient local Hindu Chandras and their kings embraced Islam. The entire Muslim population in Arakan was known as one community. Later Pathans, Mughals and even migrants from present Bangladesh added to the Muslim stock which was known as Rohingya. In 1795 in Arakan Scottish doctor and author Francis Buchanon met local people who introduced themselves as “Rooingyas”- he wrote in his book. Rohingya history dates back to centuries in Myanmar. Even after Burma became independent in 1949, Rohingyas were identified as one of Burma’s ethnic groups. But Rohingyas were denied their citizenship rights since an amendment to the country’s citizenship laws in 1982 and now are treated as illegal immigrants in Myanmar. The Myanmar’s government and the Buddhists even do not want to identify the Muslim community as ‘Rohingya’ today- they call them immigrant “Bengalees” now.

Rohingya Muslims’ political assertion in 1945
In 1945 the only Muslim political party the “Burma Muslims Congress” (BMC) was founded somewhat at the same time when the Anti Fascist People’s Freedom party (AFPFP) of General Aung San came into existence. And on December 25, 1945 U Razzak was elected the president of BMC, who made alliance with AFPFL for which he was duly rewarded with the ministerial berth of Education and Planning in Bogoke’s (General Aung San) Government. His stand of united Burmese (Burma) nation sacrificing the long-term interest of guarantee for the rights of Minority Burma Muslim satisfied not only the Burmese Buddhist leaders of the AFPFL, but strangely also the then British Government. But soon after his assassination, U Raschid and more prominently U Khin Maung Lat, followed the same primary policy of sacrificing the Rights and Interests of the Burma Muslim Community for ‘the country and their party’. No wonder most of the Burma Muslims later declined to consider or identify these ‘self interested’ experienced politicians as their true representatives or saviors’. Prime Minister U Nu, just a few months after the independence of Burma, demanded the Burma Muslim Congress to resign its membership from AFPFL. But by then the newly-formed Burmese Muslim League requested a special government department for Muslim dealings to resolve their own prospect, the same as for other minorities, who had Ministries in Yangon and governments in their states. But instead of any concrete decision the then Prime Minister, U Nu removed the Burma Muslim Congress from AFPFL on September 30, 1956 and ordered the BMC to be dissolve, and on the other hand decreed Buddhism as the state religion of Burma against the will of the ethnic minorities and various religious organizations including Burma Muslims thus sowing the seed of splitting up and clash of culture.

General Ne Win became the head of the state, his government refused to recognise the Rohingya as one of the ethnic groups of the country. In 1974 the constitution of the junta-led government approved a new list in which 135 ethnic groups were recognised as original inhabitants of the country, and the Rohingya did not find a place in there. Finally, when the 1982 Citizenship Law was passed in Burma, the Rohingyas effectively turned illegal foreigners in Burma.
Rohingyas are not allowed to travel without certified authorization, are barred from owning land and it’s compulsory to sign an assurance to have not more than two children! They need permission even to get married. Rohingyas lead a shackled life in Myanmar.

Simon Commission’s recommendation of 1919
The Simon Commission (appointed according to the Law of the Government of India in 1919, The Montague-Chelmsford Law) conducted an inquiry on the effects of Diarchy System of ruling Burma, and recommended that special places be assigned to the Muslims in Burma’s Legislative Council. The Commission further recommended that full rights of nationality should be assured to all minorities Muslims, Christians and Hindus: the right of free worship, the right to follow their own ethnicity and the right to own property and to receive a share of the public revenues for the maintenance of their own educational and charitable institutions. It recommended Home Rule or independent government separate from India or the status of a detach territory. But the British Government did not accept any of the recommendations except for the separation part, at the round table committee on India which was duly held in London in 1930. Thus the flawed policies of the British government and the cruel Burma’s Buddhist majority started unleashing terror on Muslim minority and the oldest documented riot to be recorded was in 1919 followed by riots of 1921, 1930, 1938 then in their post Independence era in 1964, 1981, 1997, 2001 and now again in 2012.

Recent persecution of Rohingyas
Persecution of the Rohingyas in Myanmar has reached terrible level in recent weeks. Since June 10, a state of Emergency has been enforced across Rakhine; Myanmar’s President Thein Sein has instigated martial law, giving the military administrative control of the region. Now the security forces have ganged up with the Rakhine Buddhists in attack against the Rohingyas. International media or other independent observers are not allowed in the areas where Rohingyas are holed up. Some hundreds of Rohingyas have been killed and thousands of Rohingya houses and businesses have been looted or set on fire in the past two months. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and other rights groups have accused the government forces for taking partisan role and supporting the Rakhine gangs. Scores of mosques have been vandalised. The ethnic cleansing of the Rohingyas is going on Myanmar and the government of Myanmar is the key sponsor of the anti-Rohingya pogrom.

Rakhine shops have stopped selling rice and other provisions to Rohingyas. Troops are openly asking Rohingyas to leave the country or starve to death. Most Rohingyas are not being allowed to run their businesses, do farming or other income-generating work.

Some Rohingyas have attempted to flee to Bangladesh by taking along the women and children. But Bangladesh has not opened the door for them this time. More than 900,000 Rohingyas are lying trapped in their villages in Myanmar. They have no place to escape and they are dying miserable deaths.

The Rohingya has been described as “among the world’s least wanted” and “one of the world’s most persecuted minorities”. Evidence has been gathered suggesting that the Burmese regime has marked certain ethnic minorities such as the Karen for extermination or 'Burmanisation'. The inhuman tyrannical government, which operates unrelenting internal security machinery, generally infiltrates or monitors the meetings and activities of virtually all organizations, including religious organizations. Religious freedom for all Muslims and Christians is reduced. It’s just three months since pro-democracy activist Daw Aung San Suu belatedly received the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize, but her silence and blind eye towards the atrocities of Rohingya Muslims has made the world wonder if her selection for the “esteemed honor” was proper.

The silence of world community
Even an appeal for an international assistance from several Rohingya organisations around the world have fallen on deaf ears and have received little attention from the international community since it has been more subtle and indirect than the mass killings in places like Rwanda or is less interesting then the so called terrorist hubs in Afghanistan or Iraq. The West has literally turned a blind eye to the plight of the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar in an attempt to maintain its economic interests in the Burma’s lucrative market. To them the violent targeting of Burmese minorities arrived at a time when the US and Britain have called off their pro-democracy campaign against the country’s junta. Regrettably the West’s silence over the bloody crackdown on Rohingya Muslims comes at a time when Western companies have jumped into Myanmar in an attempt to counterbalance the near-exclusive Chinese control over the Myanmar market. Even the silence of the United States is not unwarranted as it has deeper financial reasons. President Barak Obama has recently lifted the ban on American investment in the country and Britain has opened a trade office in Rangoon on July 11.

While it seems Myanmar has become a destination for capital investment now, as the United States, the European Union and Canada have accepted the government’s narrative of democratic transition and have largely lifted the economic sanctions enforced since mid eighties. The United State seems to have overlooked what the Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said on her visit to Myanmar late last year when she welcomed Myanmar’s first steps toward democratization, but had set down conditions for strengthening bilateral ties, that included an end to ethnic violence!

Since for the international media most parts of Arakan are still a no-go zone, specific details of killing and torture of Rohingyas are not reaching the mainstream media. Some Rohingya refugee groups from different countries, using special sources are regularly collecting news from villages which are being targeted by the Rakhines and the security forces and circulating them among refugee community and others spread across other countries.

Here is the copy of a mind-boggling report I happened to get in the first week of this month through a Human Rights Activist in the UK:

Date: 06/08/2012
Latest Situation of Rohingya People:
Four villages were burnt down and 25 Rohingyas, including children, were killed in Kyauktaw Township yesterday (05/08/2012) afternoon.
As the villages were attacked by the Rakhine Buddhists, the security forces kept a watch from distance. Details of the carnage:

Sl No

Village name

Burned houses

Dead bodies

Dead body details

01

Apauk or Aafauk

80

05

1. Fadan, son of Nazam, 30 years
2. Ms.Noorjanatson, of shwe Hla, 12 years
3. Abdusuwan, son of Abdul Khalid, 25 years
4. Ko Shwe Mi, son of Enam, 35 years
5. Halayar, son of BodawYar, 18 years
6. Nine other persons appear to have survived injuries.

02

Pyapauk or Foekafara

80



Some surely died, but no information available.

03

Gufhitaung

150

2

A mosque was burned down, two fishermen were killed by Maung sein win and his group, who is originally from Sittwe and living in Kyauktaw now, a Mosque scholar (Imam) was stabbed by spears and sustained heavy injuries in chest and head

04

Shwe Hlaing @ Milimafara

99

16

7 people injured.

05

Nedan



02

While Two brothers were returning from farmwork, a Rakhine mob attacked them. Body of the elder brother Iliyas, 42, was found. Body of the younger brother is missing.

06

Thee-de

Info not available



The whole village was burnt. Some surely died, but no information available.



According to our source from the ground, Abdusuwan s/o Abdul Khalid, 25 years from Apauk village, was inhumanly tortured while going to another village. His dead body was left on the road in front of the villages.

Date: 06/08/2012
Latest Situation of Rohingya People:

Sealed Mosques and arrested Imams

Just received a phone call from Maungdaw and got some news from the caller that the Nasaka( Myanmar border security force) yesterday raided Mosques in the following villages and took away 16 Imams and sealed the Mosques. The mosques are:
1. Kunnapara Jame-Mosque, Alethengyaw,
2. Chandapara Jame-Mosque, do
3. Donkhali Jame-Mosque, do
4. Lumbaguna Jame-Mosque do
5. Sambanna Jame-Mosque do
6. Godusara Jame-Mosque do
7. Alipara Jame- Mosque , Maungdaw
8. Khairipara Jame-Mosque, Maungdaw
9. Maung Ni para Jame-Mosque, Maungdaw

Their family members and other villagers are now very anxious about the safety of the Imams. Many Rohingyas have been arrested by the security forces and their relatives know nothing of their whereabouts.
The Nasaka men are daily asking the Rohingyas to leave Arakan. “We want this land of Arakan, we do not want you,” the men are saying. “Nobody will come to help you. Leave Myanmar as soon as possible, if you want to stay alive.”

Sadly, the mainstream media is not using such info to expose the atrocity being perpetrated by the Rakhine Buddhists and Myanmese security forces in Arakan. It’s clear that the number of Rohingyas killed in the past two months would run into several hundreds. Yet the government says the death toll is not more than 80.

The Pro military Burmese media has even declared the Rohingyas as terrorists and traitors. Since mid-June, it has tactfully used its border security forces to burn Rohingya houses, kill Rohingya men, women and even children. And recently, President Thein Sein suggested that Myanmar could end the crisis by expelling all of its Rohingyas or by having the United Nations resettle them. Interestingly, many pro-democracy activists are supporting Then Sein on the Rohingya issue. It’s clear that the ethnic cleansing of the Rohingyas is sponsored by the state. Yet the international community is mum. It is disappointing that even the Dalai Lama, who is very vocal about the Chinese aggressions into Tibet and Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi have not spoken out against the persecution of the Rohingyas in Myanmar. We understand that Ms. Suu Kyi, is not as influential as the powerful military officers. Yet, if Suu Kyi raised the issue in support of the Rohingyas, international community could have picked up the issue quickly and could pressure Myanmar to stop persecution of the Muslim community.

Despite all government-sponsored excesses being committed in Myanmar, the world seems to be more interested in cultivating ties with Myanmar, with an eye on the country’s natural resources and its geopolitical importance. None is asking the question whether Myanmar is really moving towards democracy when it’s killing thousands of its genuine citizens and seeking to drive away tens of thousands of others from the country.

http://twocircles.net/2012aug16/rohingyas_living_shackled_life_myanmar.html