Monday, February 25, 2013

TO AMERICA: CHANGE YOURSELF FIRST, BEFORE YOU TRY TO CHANGE THE WORLD...






To understand global terrorism and the current global obsession with terrorism, we have to go back to the history and study how the Americans have been playing a key role in helping terrorism flourish across the world. When during the Cold War Soviet Union attacked Afghanistan,the US - which had long been calling the shots from behind, came to the forefront, and launched a massive support and training campaign for the Afghan freedom fighters. Soon, the "mujahedeen" (holy warriors) were born and became well-known across the world.
We have not forgotten how the US encouraged the Mujahedeen in their fight against the Soviet forces. President Reagan on March 21, 1983 said: “To watch the courageous Afghan freedom fighters battle modern arsenals with simple hand-held weapons is an inspiration to those who love freedom.”

When the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan, a pro-Soviet party, took control of Afghanistan, Mujahedeen resistance spread. As Mujahedeen groups broke apart into different factions, the CIA tended to favour the most extreme among the Mujahedeen commanders. The US intelligence agency ensured that the most fanatical anti-Soviet groups were also the best trained and armed for the guerrilla warfare. It’s history now how the Mujahedeen were financed, armed and trained by the US during the administrations of Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Pakistan's secret service, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), was used as a liaison group by the US, in attempt to keep the American action as secret as possible.

Saddam Husain was the creation by the US. President Ronald Reagan initiated a strategic opening to Iraq, signing a National Security Decision Directive and selecting Donald Rumsfeld as his emissary to Hussein, whom he visited in December 1983 and March 1984. United States actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing U.S. military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to make sure that Iraq had the military weaponry required. In 1982, Iraq was removed from a list of State Sponsors of Terrorism to ease the transfer of dual-use technology to that country. But by then [in 1980] Saddam had already been made an honorary citizen of Detroit.

But By this time the world changed and the international financial institutions such as the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank through their Structural Adjustment Programs was able to do officially and openly what in previous decades had to be done through the CIA, the Marines, or hired armed force. The domination of American entrepreneurship and its industrialised allies had reached record levels without the unpleasantness of direct military intervention.

And Saddam’s Iraq, was the only Arab state to fundamentally resist such trends, the only Arab nation to combine a sizable educated population, large oil resources, and adequate water supplies, thereby making it possible for Baghdad to maintain a truly autonomous foreign and domestic strategy. Even twelve years of cruel sanctions could not depose the government or make the establishment more willing to collaborate with Washington’s tactical and financially viable agenda. As a result, the United States felt obliged to revert to cruder forms of intrusion in Iraq.
Osama bin Laden- who was once a prominent Mujahedeen leader in Afghanistan, too benefited a lot from the hospitality extended by the Americans in the beginning of his guerrilla life.

In fact in Obama, people of all faith saw not just the historic election of a Black man in America, but the hope, the possibility, that he would be different from his presidential predecessors. We all believed, as Nelson Mandela had done in post-apartheid South Africa, Obama would use diplomacy instead of bombs, to bring peace. But he has used violence and has ended up creating much bigger chaos. The popular perception today is that even he is arrogant- very much like his predecessors and his country is a self-appointed global police, even if it is sometimes under the cover of NATO or this or that coalition.

If we just examine the Egyptian revolt as it snowballed from the beginning , it becomes clear why people feel the way they do. US government financed Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak for three long decades, turned heads on his abuses of power and the people, then initially announced US help for him until it became clear that the Egyptians weren’t having it. In other words, America just cannot continue to claim they believe in democracy in America, while simultaneously condoning and aiding the opposite in other countries.

I believe it is for that reason Mr. Obama was given, extremely prematurely, a Nobel Peace Prize just a mere 9 months into his presidency. The feeling, perhaps very naively, was that he would transform America, and the world. But he disappointed us all.

In spite of Bin Laden’s murder, violence, war, and terrorism are not over, not by a long stretch. None of that will end until the US help make those things end. Their current mindset and foreign policy approach will only lead to more death of young soldiers from the US and other countries, more attacks on Americans at home and abroad. And the entire world, including us, will be perpetually distrustful, forever looking over our shoulders and living a life in fear, that fear framed by metal detectors, security cameras, and sharp glances at people who appear to be different in anyway.

Americans thinks that other nations, or terrorists, or this or that enemy, are simply picking on them because of their “freedoms.” But There are enough articles, blogs, books, and documentary films out there, if one actually cares to research American history and American foreign policy, to let one know they’ve been, on numerous occasions, as violent toward others as others have been toward them.

America should know that it can never change the world, until it changes its own way...



http://muslimmirror.com/view-points/2677-to-america-change-yourself-first-before-you-try-to-change-the-world


Monday, February 18, 2013

PROSECUTION FRAMES INNOCENT MUSLIMS, COURTS ACQUIT THEM…




THE high-profile case of the Indian Parliament Attack saw its apparent end with the execution of Afzal Guru in Delhi’s high security Tihar jail last fortnight. Hanging of Guru did not matter much to the Muslims who are often branded anti-national and gibbeted everyday despite being staunchly patriotic as others. Muslims in India have faced gross discrimination and have remained neglected for years now. No political party has ever tried to sincerely pay heed to the grievances of this largest minority community. Only during the pre-election period some leaders pretend that they care for the Muslims. Even a section of the media uses hollow rhetoric and jingoism targeting the Muslims on different issues, and they wrongly believe that they are performing a patriotic duty.

It is important to recall and realize that not even once ordinary Muslim citizens of India have supported terrorists or have been found to be involved in such nefarious activities. In the past one or two decades intelligence agencies enthusiastically arrested few thousands of Muslim youths accusing them in scores of terrorist attacks. Some were branded as masterminds of the attacks by the agencies and in several media trials they were routinely found guilty of the attacks. Thousands of Muslims remain confined and detained all over the country on fictitious terrorism charges, concocted by the (communally-biased)prosecution.

But thankfully the judiciary- that has remained unbiased considerably, apart from acquitting nearly all innocent Muslim youths, scolded police and other investigating agencies for framing the innocent Muslims. Legal experts surveying the terrorism cases involving Muslim youths say that the rate of acquittal of the Muslim youths in the past has been as high as 99%- clearly highlighting the bias Muslim youths face in prosecution. For Muslims life has been like that since long, irrespective of which party rules the country.

It is crucial to understand the approach of television news anchors who have effectively managed to drive personal viewpoint into news, and rubbish all rational voices that seek answers to complex cases including terrorist attacks. News channels are supposed to report the news, not give their editorial comments and restrict contrary voices from giving their views. Journalists must understand they are not elected by citizens or shareholders, but are accountable to the people whose trust in the accuracy and integrity that enables their work unfortunately much of this has now been squandered and history shall stand to mock them if they don’t make their style more ethical quickly to put things right.

Prosecution often brand the accused Muslim youths as “dreaded terrorists” and routinely pile cooked-up evidences against them. When these cases are heard in courts of law, the prosecution fails to prove the allegations they leveled against these innocent Muslim youths. However, after suffering confinement and disgrace for as long as 20 years, the best years of the life of the arrested youths get exhausted. Their friends and relatives shun them and their families suffer terrible devastation and trauma. And, the innocent youths, after coming out of jail face a bleak future.

Sadly the penetration of communal elements into police and intelligence agencies is responsible for all the excruciation faced by the innocent Muslim youths in terror-related cases. It indeed brings shame to the law enforcement structure of the country. As falsely the Muslim youths are framed in the cases, the real culprits of most terror activities wander freely. There is also a tendency among the investigative agencies to choose and fix some suitable ‘scapegoats’ and declare a case solved- to cover up someone else’s crime directly or indirectly and to willfully target Muslim youth in the cases. Such wrongful arrests have the potential to alienate Muslim youths in the society.

It is imperative to know Indian Muslims are as patriotic as any other stakeholder to this country and rarely will you find a Muslim being convicted in any terrorist or anti national activity by the court and that’s proof enough for the said disputation. Therefore it is earnestly anticipated from the people sitting at helm in corridors of power, civil society and media barons to take a realistic and positive approach towards this alienation of Muslims in Indian society as weak minority shall make a weaker nation.

A small list of cases in which Muslims had been framed by the prosecution, but judiciary acquitted them:

In Hyderabad the 7th Metropolitan Sessions Judge Radha Krishna threw out the casehttp://twocircles.net/2008dec31/21_hyderabadi_muslim_youths_acquitted_terror_charges.html and acquitted all the accused. He said that the prosecution had failed to bring any evidence to prove the charges against them.

1.Md.Abdul Sattar (In Cherlapally Jail) Arrested on 15/06/2007

2.Md.Abdul Kareem Qadri @ Karem (In Cherlapally Jail) Arrested on 15/06/2007

3.Masood Ahamed (In Cherlapally Jail) Arrested on 4/09/2007

4.Arshad Khan @ Fayaz Khan Arrested on 4/09/2007

5.Md.Naseeruddin @Fayaz Khan Arrested on 4/09/2007

6.Md.Abdul Raheem @ Raheem Arrested on 4/09/2007

7.Syed Abdul Qader @Imran Arrested on 4/09/2007

8.Shaik Mohammed Faredd @ Ali Pasha Arrested on 4/09/2007

9.Gulam Aslam Siddiqui Arrested on 4/09/2007

10.Syed Abdul Sami (Absconding)

11.Md.Abdul Kareem@ Anwar Arested on 8/9/2007

12.Syed Zulfiqar Ahamed@ Ifteqar (Absconding)

13.Md.Abdul Wajeed. Arrested on 8/9/2007

14.Abdul Wase Arrested on 8/9/2007

15.Mohd Abdul Majid B/O SHAHED BILAL Arrested on 27/9/2007

16.Mohd Rayees Uddin Arrested on 6/9/2007

17.Md.Mustafa Ali Arrested on 6/9/2007

18.Ibrahim Ali Junaid Arrested on 8/9/2007

19.Mohtashim Billa S/O MOULANA ABDUL ALEEM ISLAHI Arrested on 6/3/2008

20.Gulam Hasan Siddique (Absconding)

21.Md.Shakeel .Arrested on 27/9/2007



In Ahmadabad On Jun 11, 2009 , (http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-06 11/ahmedabad/28193522_1_acquits-jihadi-charge-sheet) the Additional Sessions Judge IB Waghela acquitted Kari Mufidul Islam Shaikh along with city-based youths Ilyas Memon and Siraj Ansari some three years after the city crime branch had booked them for “sheltering jehadi terrorists and conspiring to avenge 2002 riots”. The judge held that there was no evidence against them to establish their involvement in terrorist activities.

Finally compensation for 70 Muslims youth ( http://nvonews.com/2011/12/13/muslim-youth-get-acquitted-in-terrorism-charges-get-compensation) who were arrested in connection with Mecca Masjid Blast and later released by court as there were no evidence against them. Perhaps this will be the first instance in India when a Government will give compensation to falsely arrested people for terrorism.

Police must ensure that no innocent person has the feeling of sufferance only because “my name is Khan, but I am not a terrorist,” a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad said (http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/dont-give-terror-tag-to-innocent-minority-people-supreme-court/article3939481.ece). It ordered the acquittal of 11 persons, arrested under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and other laws, and convicted for allegedly planning to create communal violence during the Jagannath Puri Yatra in Ahmadabad in 1994.



In a separate case a principal district judge GN Patel acquitted Firoz alias Abdullah Ghaswala fromMumbai, Mohammed Ali alias Ubaidullah Chhipa, Vakil Ahmed Saiyed and Umar Farooq Shaikh from Ahmedabad, Anisul alias Mursalim alias Sujoy alias Ashiq Bari and his brother Muhibul alias Mushtaqim Bari from Bangladesh(http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-07-29/ahmedabad/28276396_1_hawala-racket-trial-courts-gujarat-ats) All the six were booked by ATS, then headed by DG Vanzara (who was suspended and is now in jail), in May 2006 for conspiracy, waging war against nation and possession of explosive substance. They were accused of going to Pakistan to receive training from Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Azam Chima. Upon returning from the neighbouring country, they were planning to blow up Kandla pipeline, Somnath temple and Sabarmati overbridge besides the offices of RSS, VHP and Bajrang Dal, the prosecution alleged.

And 14 Muslim youths were arrested following the serial bomb blasts in Jaipur on 13th May2008.(http://twocircles.net/2011dec25/youths_acquitted_jaipur_blast_charge_narrate_jail_horror.html), All 14 were acquitted by the Rajasthan High Court on 9th December, 2011 .


http://www.muslimmirror.com/view-points/2409-prosecution-frames-innocent-muslims-courts-acquit-them#disqus_thread


http://twocircles.net/2013feb17/framing_innocent_muslims_who_responsible.html

http://www.theeasternpost.org/archive_more_cover.php?id=164&dt=2013-03-13

Sunday, February 3, 2013

The Controversy surrounding Kamal Hassan’s “Vishwaroopam”….





Kamal Hassan’s recently-released Vishwaroopam has landed in a big controversy in Tamil Nadu and the film has been slapped a two-week ban in his home state Tamil Nadu few days ago. It is alleged that as the subject of the film deals with the world favorite topic these days i.e., “Islamic Terrorism” and that the main villain in the movie is named Omar (many refers it to Taliban’s Mullah Omar), the Muslims have protested against the release of the film in the state. And now, there is a rumour that even Uttar Pradesh is set to ban the movie soon because, the authorities there think that it had the potential to hurt Muslim emotion there.

A handful of men who are driven by their own political interest are appearing before the media apparently as the representatives of the community. What these men are saying about the film before the media are not always enough what Muslim masses think about it. It is of utmost importance that we offer the Muslim viewpoint on the entire subject. Most of the people protesting against the film have not seen the film as it is not released there as yet. But on the basis of whatever little we have read about the film, we are sure that the movie is based on terrorism, and “Al Qaida” does form an integral part of the storyline with ‘Omar” as one of the evil protagonists. Now the issue is: is the name of Omar or the interwoven reference to Al Qaida or the terrorist shown offering namaaz or reading the Quran objectionable? No absolutely not. It is no secret that Al Qaida is an Islam-based organization which has indulged in evil activities, and in that case it should not be bothersome to us at all.

Just like all members of the groups that killed Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi happened to be Hindus and Sikhs. But we can never say that all Hindus or Sikhs are terrorists. There are noble and evil people existing in all communities. However, in recent times Islamic Terrorism has become the favorite topic with the film-makers globally.

But then there are other angles to the controversy as well which are equally important to be mentioned here. As some say the trouble started brewing earlier when Kamal Hassan’s big gamble to screen the film simultaneously on (Direct to Home) DTH services came to the limelight. Apparently, he struck a deal with several DTH operators which would have made it possible to screen Vishwaroopam on DTH on the same day as its theatrical release. As soon as one leading distributor came to know about Kamal Hassan’s new distribution model, he alerted other theatre owners across Tamil Nadu. Others put in that Kamal Hassan declined the copyrights offer from a famous south Indian satellite channel, thus antagonizing some powerful people in Tamil Nadu. There is a third version too that goes like on December 30 at a function down south Kamal Hassan admired Mr.P.Chidambaram’s efficiency as a politician and said that he was fit to become the prime minister of the country. Although how efficient Mr Chidambaram would be as the PM is a subject for a bigger debate, the fact is the comment by Mr Hassan has certainly not gone down well with some powerful politicians on the other side.



But whatever the reasons be, the community feels in the absence of proper leadership amongst the Muslims, they are made scapegoats in all cases and have turned as the favorite punching bag for the pseudo-nationalists who tend to undermine the glaring fact that no religious community is synonymous with terrorism and so the Muslims must not be seen through the prejudiced spectrum as some filmmakers and others are doing.

There have been incidents where a colonel-ranking Hindu officer was found ganging up with some Hindu religious people in terrorist attacks against Muslim targets by India’s National Investigation Agency. In many attacks those terrorists, who included even one Hindu nun, interestingly posed as Muslims, I wonder, why no filmmaker has shown interest in this subject of Hindu terrorism as yet. Frankly speaking many films have been made on Islamic terrorism and the theme has become hackneyed. On the other hand, Hindu terrorism (http://www.indianexpress.com/news/joining-the-dots/1068448/) is rather new and films based on this theme could be very interesting, I think....

http://www.kashmirmonitor.org/kashmonitor/02062013-ND-controversy-surrounding-%E2%80%9Cvishwaroopam%E2%80%9D%E2%80%A6-41589.aspx

http://www.milligazette.com/news/6300-kamal-hassans-vishwaroopam


Please follow the link to talk show (I attended) on NDTV INDIA's Prime Time of 31/01/2013 on the same issue....

http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/prime-time/video-story/263638?fb_action_ids=553375484682244&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_source=timeline_og&action_object_map=%7B%22553375484682244%22%3A345766705537210%7D&action_type_map=%7B%22553375484682244%22%3A%22og.recommends%22%7D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D&code=AQDxUwEAFQMDV2k7rhPw_3gi8L2lsOx1o0kLPXavlwM7tTMML-YPL8u0tPCs0dwegx-B8LIadcVgTFfxEJcTUS3lnKyW4OOazd7U3tIgcG34pAu_-bwQQim3gQ9oASY1D4_GgSxpbMiPrkwDj1w2gtzq7SUEvJGkaS01iLV-ct7ygnQI5e7nMVNNPtknuwSd7uxBzRYPuiqIFtDr55bvcdU8#_=_